Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Vadim Alekseenko Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Carabelli vs Alekseenko analysis and find out who is favored!
Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Vadim Alekseenko Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Carabelli 1 - 0 Alekseenko
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Carabelli has won 48.49% of points on their second serve, while Alekseenko has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Carabelli, in recent form, has won 55.39% of their opponent's second serve points, while Alekseenko has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.85% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Carabelli has saved 60.67% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Alekseenko has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Carabelli has won 66.22% of matches played (W/L 49/ 25), with Alekseenko winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Carabelli has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 64% (W/L 287/ 160), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1). Alekseenko has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 49% (W/L 177/ 181), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 25% (W/L 1/ 3).
- Player level: In the last year, Carabelli has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 72.88% of matches (W/L 43/ 16), where as Alekseenko has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Carabelli winning 1 times and Alekseenko being victorious 0 times. They have played 2 sets in total, with Carabelli winning 2 and Alekseenko winning 0. The last match between Carabelli and Alekseenko was at the Turkey F27, 05-07-2016, First, Hard with Camilo Ugo Carabelli getting the victory 7-6(2) 6-1.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:0:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Carabelli and Alekseenko have played a deciding set 0 times, with Carabelli winning 0 times and Alekseenko 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 1 tiebreaks against each other with Carabelli winning 1, and Alekseenko 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Carabelli has played against opponents with an average rank of 278.66 while Alekseenko has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Carabelli has won 68% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Alekseenko has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Carabelli has converted 46.6% of breakpoint opportunities, and Alekseenko has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
114
Rank
96
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
Ret.
Rank
497
High
41
Age
R
Plays
L
L
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
Form
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
L
L
63% (316-185)
Career Total W/L
47% (250-280)
64% (27-15)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$130,440
Career Prize Money
$0
2
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Camilo Ugo Carabelli vs Vadim Alekseenko For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Carabelli VS Alekseenko
Sportsbook
Offer
Carabelli VS Alekseenko H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Vadim Alekseenko |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 0 |
| Games Won | 13 | 7 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 0 |
| DFs (Total) | 3 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:0:0 | 2:0:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 49% (28/57) | 57% (34/60) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 75% (21/28) | 47% (16/34) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 55% (16/29) | 35% (9/26) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 75% (6/8) | 60% (3/5) |
| Return Points W% | 58% (35/60) | 35% (20/57) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Carabelli VS Alekseenko H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(2) 6-1 |
Stats 
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Vadim Alekseenko
49%
(
28 of
57)
1st Serve %
57%
(
34 of
60)
2
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
4
75%
(
21 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
16 of
34)
55%
(
16 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
9 of
26)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
58%
(
35 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
45
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Camilo Ugo Carabelli | Vadim Alekseenko |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 64% (27/15) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 59% (56/39) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 53% (499/437) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 67% (2/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 64% (25/14) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.21 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 98 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.19 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 85 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:59:53 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 234.4 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 63% (1900/3024) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 67% (1278/1900) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 48% (545/1124) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 47% (151/324) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 42% (1282/3050) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 50% (2/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 33% (1/2) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 43% (3/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 75% (21/7) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 63% (25/40) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (10/20) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 73% (8/11) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (23/23) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (23/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 21% (19/4) | 0% (0/0) |
Camilo Ugo Carabelli Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Taberner
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
75%
(
42 of
56)
1st Serve %
61%
(
36 of
59)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
0
69%
(
29 of
42)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
18 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
29 of
59)
67
Total Points Won
48
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
57%
(
38 of
67)
0
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
2
68%
(
28 of
41)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
16 of
29)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
33%
(
23 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
27 of
67)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
65%
(
40 of
62)
1st Serve %
55%
(
33 of
60)
1
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
1
70%
(
28 of
40)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
20 of
33)
45%
(
10 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
10 of
27)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
39%
(
24 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
68
Total Points Won
54
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
62%
(
41 of
66)
1st Serve %
57%
(
39 of
68)
12
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
3
76%
(
31 of
41)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
25 of
39)
48%
(
12 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
10 of
29)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
23 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
7-6(1) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Luciano Darderi
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
39%
(
14 of
36)
1st Serve %
46%
(
25 of
54)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
86%
(
12 of
14)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
15 of
25)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
9 of
29)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
8 of
36)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
32
|
6-3 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Taro Daniel
52%
(
29 of
56)
1st Serve %
57%
(
45 of
79)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
2
55%
(
16 of
29)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
23 of
45)
37%
(
10 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
11 of
34)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
63%
(
5 of
8)
54%
(
30 of
56)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
45 of
79)
71
Total Points Won
64
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Brandon Nakashima
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
74%
(
57 of
77)
1st Serve %
65%
(
59 of
91)
7
Aces
5
0
Double Faults
0
86%
(
49 of
57)
1st Serve Won
76%
(
45 of
59)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
69%
(
22 of
32)
0%
(
0 of
2)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
19%
(
15 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
26%
(
24 of
91)
86
Total Points Won
82
|
7-6(4) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
Player
Bernabe Zapata Miralles
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
68%
(
60 of
88)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
4
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
38 of
60)
63%
(
20 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
15%
(
2 of
13)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
5)
32%
(
24 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
38 of
88)
89
Total Points Won
74
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Elahi Galan
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
64%
(
45 of
70)
1st Serve %
54%
(
56 of
103)
5
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
4
78%
(
35 of
45)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
37 of
56)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
21 of
47)
12%
(
2 of
17)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
20 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
45 of
103)
95
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(2) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| SF |
Stats
Joao Lucas Reis Da Silva
Player
Camilo Ugo Carabelli
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
59%
(
50 of
85)
1
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
3
68%
(
25 of
37)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
31 of
50)
71%
(
10 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
31%
(
16 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
41 of
85)
76
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Vadim Alekseenko Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 | w/o | H2H | |||
| R1 |
Stats
Lucas Hellfritsch
Player
Vadim Alekseenko
65%
(
70 of
108)
1st Serve %
72%
(
68 of
95)
0
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
56%
(
39 of
70)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
35 of
68)
42%
(
16 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
9 of
27)
57%
(
8 of
14)
Break Points Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
49%
(
53 of
108)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
51 of
95)
106
Total Points Won
97
|
6-4 3-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-2 7-6(6) | H2H | |||
| R2 |
Stats
Paul Woerner
Player
Vadim Alekseenko
91%
(
74 of
81)
1st Serve %
75%
(
38 of
51)
2
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
3
65%
(
48 of
74)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
24 of
38)
29%
(
2 of
7)
2nd Serve Won
15%
(
2 of
13)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
38%
(
31 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
25 of
51)
75
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vadim Alekseenko
Player
Gokberk Ergeneman
57%
(
40 of
70)
1st Serve %
68%
(
36 of
53)
0
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
68%
(
27 of
40)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
21 of
36)
43%
(
13 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
5 of
17)
50%
(
5 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
43%
(
30 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
27 of
53)
67
Total Points Won
56
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Luca Prevosto
Player
Vadim Alekseenko
63%
(
44 of
70)
1st Serve %
56%
(
34 of
61)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
68%
(
30 of
44)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
19 of
34)
62%
(
16 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
17 of
27)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
24 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
25 of
61)
71
Total Points Won
60
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Claudio Fortuna
Player
Vadim Alekseenko
60%
(
28 of
47)
1st Serve %
74%
(
49 of
66)
1
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
23 of
49)
58%
(
11 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
30%
(
14 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
35 of
66)
68
Total Points Won
45
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Vadim Alekseenko
Player
Samuil Konov
55%
(
37 of
67)
1st Serve %
69%
(
63 of
91)
-
Aces
-
1
Double Faults
3
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
35 of
63)
57%
(
17 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
43%
(
6 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
2 of
8)
31%
(
21 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
44 of
91)
90
Total Points Won
68
|
6-1 4-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q2 | 6-4 6-2 | H2H | |||
| QF |
Stats
Vladimir Filip
Player
Vadim Alekseenko
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
51%
(
27 of
53)
4
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
56%
(
18 of
32)
1st Serve Won
30%
(
8 of
27)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
10 of
26)
64%
(
7 of
11)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
45%
(
24 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
66%
(
35 of
53)
64
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
view more
Carabelli Vs Alekseenko Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Carabelli are available here and Alekseenko photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
